18. BIOETHICS

Written and reviewed by Dr. Saint Paul | Pharm.D Graduate from JNTUK | Pharmacy Educator and D.Pharmacy Academic Content Creator

Bioethics is the discipline dealing with the ethical implications of biological research and application, especially in medicine. It includes the study of what is right and wrong in new discoveries and techniques in biology, such as genetic engineering and organ transplantation. The term Bioethics (Greek bios = life; ethos = behavior) was coined in 1926 by Fritz Jahr.

  • 1947: Nuremberg Doctors’ Trial and Nuremberg Code
  • 1948: Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UN)
  • 1953: Double helical structure of DNA
  • 1962: Kefauver-Harris amendments to FD&C Act
  • 1964: Declaration of Helsinki (WHO)
  • 1967: First heart transplant
  • 1973: Roe vs. Wade decision
  • 1976: Karen Quinlan decision
  • 1981: First reported cases of AIDS
  • 1997: Birth of ‘Dolly’ (cloned sheep)
  • 2000: Rough draft of Human Genome
  • 2001: Terri Schiavo Case
  • 1972: Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment revealed
  • 1973: American Hospital Association – Patients’ Bill of Rights
  • 1975: Asilomar meeting on recombinant DNA
  • 1978: Belmont Report
  • 1984: John Moore case
  • 1994: Oregon Death with Dignity Act
  • 2001: George W. Bush stem cell policy
  • 2006: Launching of No Lie MRI
  • 2007: Sperm sorting
  • 2008: Health care access on election agenda

This principle highlights the need to honour autonomous people’s right to make their own decisions. It acknowledges their right to decide on their own treatment. Informed consent is essential in healthcare because it guarantees that patients are provided with the information they need to make decisions about their care.

This principle is based on the concept “do no harm”. Healthcare providers have to refrain from hurting their patients. The two most important components of non-maleficence are ensuring patient safety and reducing hazards.

This principle involves giving patients advantages while balancing potential hazards. Doctors work to develop care plans that optimise advantages for patients. It focuses on encouraging the patient’s well-being and improving their health.

The principle emphasises fairness. It guarantees the equitable distribution of medical benefits. It guides the allocation of scarce resources (solid organs or costly tests). It is crucial to treat people equally who have comparable requirements and circumstances.

The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, is the apex body in India for the formulation, coordination, and promotion of biomedical research. It is one of the oldest medical research bodies in the world.

  • 1980: Policy Statement on Ethical Considerations Involved in Research on Human Subjects
  • 2000: Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research on Human Subjects
  • 2006: Revised Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research on Human Participants
  • 2017: National Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical and Health Research involving Human Participants
  • 2017: National Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Children
  1. Developed two national guidelines (2017) – for human participants and for children.
  2. Dissemination activities to raise awareness among physicians, researchers, ethics committee members, students, nurses, and academics.
  3. Ensures safety of participants, prevents exploitation, and protects rights, welfare, and safety.
  4. Leading in developing and periodically revising guidelines since 1980.
  5. Guidelines cover all biomedical and health research (clinical, basic sciences, epidemiological, socio-behavioural, public health, data/sample studies).
  6. Guidelines are thorough, user-friendly, and harmonised with national and international requirements.
  1. Guided by respect for dignity and rights of participants.
  2. Clear scientific purpose in accordance with ethical principles.
  3. Welfare of individual over interests of science and society.
  4. Conducted only by individuals with appropriate training and expertise.
  5. Risks and benefits carefully weighed.
  6. Sufficient information for informed decision.
  7. Informed consent from all participants.
  8. Freedom to withdraw at any time without penalty.
  9. Protection from harm, discomfort, and exploitation.
  10. Respect for privacy and confidentiality.
  11. Disclose all potential conflicts of interest.
  1. Transparent and accountable manner.
  2. Subject to independent ethical review.
  3. Sensitive to cultural differences.
  4. Appropriate medical care and treatment, including access to beneficial interventions.
  5. Promotes welfare of society as a whole.
  6. Respect rights and interests of vulnerable populations.
  7. Minimise adverse effects on the environment.
  8. Comply with all relevant laws and regulations.
  9. Results disseminated in timely and responsible manner.
  10. Guided by honesty, integrity, and transparency in all aspects.
PrincipleKey ConceptApplication
Respect for AutonomyRight to make own decisionsInformed consent
Non-Maleficence“Do no harm”Patient safety, hazard reduction
BeneficenceGiving advantages, balancing risksOptimising patient benefits
Justice<||point||>Fairness, equitable distributionAllocation of scarce resources
Share your love

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *